The recent enforcement measures taken by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against an NFT project have ignited discussions and apprehension within the cryptocurrency community. Oscar Franklin Tan, the Chief Legal Officer at the NFT platform Enjin, has expressed his concerns, arguing that it is problematic to make sweeping generalisations and categorise all NFTs as securities. Such a broad classification, he contends, has the potential to stifle creativity and innovation within the NFT space.

On August 28, the SEC filed charges against Impact Theory, an entertainment company, alleging the sale of unregistered securities in the form of NFTs known as “Founder’s Keys.” These NFTs were marketed by Impact Theory as investments in their business and purportedly generated approximately $30 million in sales.

The SEC’s stance is that these NFTs constituted investment contracts and should consequently be treated as securities. The regulatory body asserts that Impact Theory violated the Securities Act of 1933 by selling these NFTs without proper registration.

However, dissenting voices have emerged concerning the SEC’s position. On the same day as the enforcement action, SEC commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda issued a dissenting statement, challenging the foundation of the SEC’s decision. They argued that the statements made by the company and purchasers cited by the SEC did not meet the criteria for forming an investment contract.

Furthermore, the commissioners pointed out that the SEC typically refrains from initiating enforcement actions against sellers of items like watches, paintings, or collectibles, even when these items come with vague promises to “build the brand” or enhance the resale value.

The SEC’s actions have raised concerns within the NFT community, with many believing that several NFT projects could potentially fall under the same description outlined by the SEC. Some contend that the specifics of the Impact Theory case might apply to “quite a few” NFT projects. Community members have emphasised that numerous NFT project founders employ messaging similar to that of Impact Theory, encouraging potential buyers and promising profits as the project progresses.

The SEC suing Impact Theory for selling NFT securities is a pretty big deal.

Because if you take a closer look at the details, the description applies to quite a few NFT projects – probably also to one you are holding right now. pic.twitter.com/75kY0QQIDG

— wale.swoosh 🐳 (@waleswoosh) August 28, 2023

The SEC filed and settled its first NFT enforcement action today: https://t.co/RwaMGueBZK Here's Commissioner Uyeda's and my dissent: https://t.co/WhLKX3Tl8X

— Hester Peirce (@HesterPeirce) August 28, 2023

ADVERTISEMENT

Oscar Franklin Tan, Chief Legal Officer at Enjin, has shared his perspective on the SEC’s recent actions. Tan argues that it is problematic to classify all NFTs as securities, emphasising that NFTs encompass a wide range of possibilities, from digital graphics to health records and land titles. He contends that the lack of clear regulatory guidelines could deter creators from exploring various economic and social models within the Web3 space, ultimately hindering the NFT sector from reaching its full potential.

Tan calls for enhanced regulatory clarity from the SEC, stating that creators should not be left to wonder whether they inadvertently created an investment product.

This is not the first instance where NFTs have teetered on the brink of being considered securities. Earlier this year, on February 22, a U.S. judge suggested that NBA Top Shot NFTs might meet the criteria for securities, citing their potential to establish a legal relationship between investors and promoters, thereby constituting an investment contract.

Disclaimer: This article is based on information available as of August 29, 2023. It is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their research and seek advice from legal experts regarding any legal matters related to cryptocurrencies, NFTs, or digital assets.